| Poll |
| Which version of office to you prefer? |
| Office 2007 |
 
|
70% |
[ 7 ] |
| Office 2003 |
 
|
30% |
[ 3 ] |
| Office XP |
 
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Total Votes : 10 |
|
| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/Sysforums/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 28/08/2008 05:17:47
|
MBeckett
Super SysAider

Joined: 07/07/2008 09:42:34
Messages: 68
Location: England, UK
Offline
|
"...A must-have for serious Mac users."
*bows* credit given where it's due!
|
"REEEEBOOOOOOOOOOOOOT!" |
|
|
![[Post New]](/Sysforums/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 28/08/2008 05:22:52
|
Obelix
SysAid Wiz

Joined: 12/06/2008 07:14:19
Messages: 331
Offline
|
I have no idea why they say that...
Was thinking more about "happy feet" products.
I despise Mac.
It's exactly the anti-thesis - style over substance !
Mua hah ah a hah ah ah ahahahahahahahhaaaaaaaaaa
Have you seen Airbook ?
Only thing cool is the thickness.
What does thickness has anything to do with computing ?!?!?
|
That is not a bug, it's a feature... |
|
|
![[Post New]](/Sysforums/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 28/08/2008 05:37:36
|
techguy
SysAid Wiz

Joined: 11/06/2008 08:04:31
Messages: 372
Offline
|
The best version is OPENoffice! no charge, no restrictions, but a little quirky around the edges. BUT it desperatley needs an outlook clone.
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/Sysforums/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 28/08/2008 05:45:25
|
MBeckett
Super SysAider

Joined: 07/07/2008 09:42:34
Messages: 68
Location: England, UK
Offline
|
Obelix wrote:I have no idea why they say that...
Was thinking more about "happy feet" products.
I despise Mac.
It's exactly the anti-thesis - style over substance !
Mua hah ah a hah ah ah ahahahahahahahhaaaaaaaaaa
Have you seen Airbook ?
Only thing cool is the thickness.
What does thickness has anything to do with computing ?!?!?
Yes I have seen the Airbook, aren't they making another one but to be more beefy or is that a rumour?
I like the Mac for their (seemingly) more professional reputation and design (apart from the fact that they have a lot of functionality also).
I'm guessing the thickness is more for people that travel a lot, carrying the smaller/lighter MacAir seems to be a better choice (if they can afford it).
|
"REEEEBOOOOOOOOOOOOOT!" |
|
|
![[Post New]](/Sysforums/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 28/08/2008 06:09:00
|
Obelix
SysAid Wiz

Joined: 12/06/2008 07:14:19
Messages: 331
Offline
|
techguy wrote:The best version is OPENoffice! no charge, no restrictions, but a little quirky around the edges. BUT it desperatley needs an outlook clone.
Indeed...
*widened excited eyes*
More precisely an EXCHANGE client clone...
If it's a straight forward smtp-pop thing there's no problem.
McBeckett wrote:Yes I have seen the Airbook, aren't they making another one but to be more beefy or is that a rumour?
I like the Mac for their (seemingly) more professional reputation and design (apart from the fact that they have a lot of functionality also).
I'm guessing the thickness is more for people that travel a lot, carrying the smaller/lighter MacAir seems to be a better choice (if they can afford it).
Ooo don't get me wrong... they ARE professional. They are professional ARTIST.
And thinner and smaller is not interchangeable.. it's too wide to be small (read:practical).
If mobility is important I'd go with UMPC - fraction of the cost, same full functionality and power. Only thing to get used to is the 8" average screen and keyboard.
|
That is not a bug, it's a feature... |
|
|
![[Post New]](/Sysforums/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 18/09/2008 11:21:29
|
CCSO IT
SysAider

Joined: 05/09/2008 12:11:04
Messages: 27
Online
|
I like OpenOffice personally, but I tend to be a bit of an open source fanboy. Unfortunately, I've never been able to get Mozilla's Thunderbird to work as well as outlook. Here we use office 2003, but the only reason we aren't upgrading is that it takes a LONG time to train all of our users (most of which are not that tech-savvy) on how to use a new product when 2003 works very similarly to 2000.
|
Thanks,
Thomas Hardin
Microcomputer Specialist
Clackamas County Sheriff's Office |
|
|